Pick your models
Choose the Simple or churn-based LTV method, and whether to compute CAC from spend or enter it directly.
Calculate customer LTV, CAC, the LTV:CAC ratio and payback period — then reverse it to find the max CAC you can afford. All on gross profit, in any currency.
Updated Reviewed by Calcrux Editorial
Use the calculator
Enter the values that match your situation — results update in real time as you type.
Your numbers
Results
Results appear as you type
No submit button needed
If it costs more to win a customer than they ever earn you, growth just loses money faster. This calculator works out your customer lifetime value, your acquisition cost, the LTV:CAC ratio and payback period — and then runs it backwards to tell you the most you can afford to spend to acquire a customer.
The headline number is the **LTV:CAC ratio** — lifetime profit per customer divided by what you paid to acquire them. The long-standing benchmark is **3:1**: below 1:1 you lose money on every customer; 1–3:1 is thin; 3–5:1 is healthy; above 5:1 is strong but often means you're *under-investing* in growth. Just as important is the **CAC payback period** — how many months it takes to earn that acquisition cost back. A 2:1 ratio that pays back in 6 months can be healthier for an ecommerce cash-flow than a 5:1 ratio that takes two years.
The mistake that quietly sinks DTC brands is computing **LTV on revenue instead of gross profit**. A customer who spends $200 over their lifetime at a 45% margin is only worth $90 in profit — so a flattering 6.7:1 revenue ratio is really a 3:1 profit ratio. This tool computes LTV on gross profit by default and shows the revenue figure only as a contrast, with a warning, so you never make that comparison by accident.
It also handles **both LTV models in one place**, which no free competitor does: the **Simple** model (AOV × purchases/year × margin × lifespan) that repeat-purchase ecommerce sellers think in, and the **churn-based** model (÷ churn rate) that subscription and SaaS-style businesses use — with the conversion shown both ways (50% churn = a 2-year lifespan). Pick whichever matches the data you actually have.
And the part founders actually need for planning: enter a **target ratio** and the tool reverses the math to your **max affordable CAC** — the ceiling you can bid up to and still hit your goal — plus the headroom versus what you spend today. It even shows how a small retention gain (one more half-purchase a year) moves the ratio, because lifting repeat rate is almost always cheaper than buying more customers. Benchmarks follow Matrix Partners / Foundry (SaaS ~3:1), Eightx (DTC 1.5–3:1), and Corporate Finance Institute (payback). Works in any currency — no rates, no conversion, universal math.
Four short steps — under a minute.
Choose the Simple or churn-based LTV method, and whether to compute CAC from spend or enter it directly.
Your marketing spend and new customers, or a CAC you already track.
AOV, purchases per year, gross margin, and how long customers stay (or your churn rate).
Get LTV, the ratio, payback, a health verdict, and the max CAC you can afford to hit your target.
Steps to use the LTV CAC Calculator: Pick your models, Enter CAC, Enter economics, Read the verdict.
Standard unit-economics math, in plain algebra — every figure on gross profit.
What it costs to win one customer. Or enter a CAC you already track. Use blended CAC for a whole-business view, paid-only CAC to judge paid channels.
The profit a retained customer generates each year. The margin term is what turns revenue into real, comparable value.
For repeat-purchase ecommerce when you know roughly how long customers stay. Always on gross profit.
For subscriptions or when you track churn. Implied lifespan = 1 ÷ churn, so 50% churn = a 2-year lifespan — the two methods reconcile exactly at the same lifespan.
The ratio is the headline health metric; payback is how fast the cash comes back. Both matter — fast payback beats a high ratio that takes years.
The ceiling you can spend per customer and still hit your goal. Headroom = max CAC − current CAC tells you how much acquisition budget is unused (or overspent).
Watch the gross-profit framing change the story.
$50.00 × $2.00 purchases × $45.00% margin = $45.00/year. (Note the margin — without it you'd wrongly use $100 of revenue.)
Annual gross profit: $45.00
$45.00/year × $2.00 years = $90.00. Revenue LTV would be $200.00 — but that's not profit, so never compare it to CAC.
LTV: $90.00 (not $200.00)
Ratio = $90.00 ÷ CAC $30 (blended) = $3.00:1 — right on the healthy 3:1 mark. Monthly gross profit is $45.00 ÷ 12 = $3.75, so payback = CAC $30 (blended) ÷ 3.75 = $8.00 months.
Ratio $3.00:1 · payback $8.00 months
To hold a 3:1 target, you can spend up to $90.00 ÷ 3 = $30.00 per customer. You're at CAC $30 (blended) — right at the limit, no headroom to bid higher without lifting LTV first.
Max CAC: $30.00
The takeaway
A textbook-healthy 3:1. The fastest lever isn't spending more — it's retention: nudging repeat purchases from 2 to 2.5/year lifts LTV to $112.50 and the ratio to 3.75:1 with zero extra CAC.
Standard benchmarks. Ecommerce ratios run lower than SaaS because gross margins are lower (40–60% vs 70–85%).
| Metric | Poor | Average | Good | Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTV:CAC ratio | < 1:1 | 1–3:1 | 3–5:1 | 4–5:1 |
| CAC payback (months) | > 18 | 12–18 | 6–12 | < 6 |
| Gross margin (ecom) | < 30% | 30–45% | 45–60% | 60%+ |
| Repeat purchase rate | < 15% | 15–30% | 30–50% | 50%+ |
| Annual churn | > 70% | 50–70% | 30–50% | < 30% |
SaaS tools only do churn-based LTV; ecommerce tools only do simple — and most compute LTV on revenue. We fix all three.
| Feature | Calcrux | Typical free tool | SaaS analytics app |
|---|---|---|---|
| LTV on gross profit (not revenue) | Often revenue | ||
| Simple AND churn-based LTV | One or the other | Churn only | |
| CAC payback period | Some | ||
| Max affordable CAC (reverse) | Rare | ||
| Health verdict + benchmarks | Some | ||
| Retention sensitivity readout | |||
| Revenue-LTV trap warning | |||
| Works in any currency, free | Most US-only |
Why it matters
A customer who spends $200 lifetime at 45% margin is worth $90 in profit. Using the $200 makes a 3:1 profit ratio look like a flattering 6.7:1 — and justifies overspending on acquisition.
Fix
Always use gross-profit LTV. We do by default and warn whenever the revenue figure would mislead.
Why it matters
A 5:1 ratio sounds great, but if payback takes 24 months you're funding acquisition and inventory out of pocket for two years. Cash, not just the ratio, kills ecommerce brands.
Fix
Read the ratio and the payback period together. Under 12 months keeps cash flowing.
Why it matters
Assuming a 5-year lifespan when most customers buy twice and vanish inflates LTV and hides an unsustainable model. Garbage lifespan in, garbage ratio out.
Fix
Use real cohort data. If unsure, use churn-based LTV from a measured churn rate — it's harder to fool yourself.
Why it matters
Blended CAC (all spend ÷ all new customers) includes free/organic customers, flattering the number. Paid CAC judges paid channels honestly. Comparing a paid-channel LTV to blended CAC is apples to oranges.
Fix
Be consistent. Use blended for the whole-business view, paid CAC to evaluate paid acquisition.
Why it matters
A 5:1+ ratio often means you're acquiring too slowly and leaving growth on the table. The "best" ratio isn't the highest — it's the one that maximizes profitable growth.
Fix
If your ratio is well above 3:1 with fast payback, use the max-affordable-CAC headroom to scale acquisition.
Why it matters
LTV isn't destiny — it's the most movable number you have. A small lift in repeat rate or AOV compounds across the whole customer base for zero extra CAC.
Fix
Use the retention sensitivity readout: often a half-purchase more per year beats any acquisition tactic.
Lifting repeat purchases is usually cheaper than buying customers — and it raises LTV across everyone you've ever acquired.
Higher order value flows straight into LTV (at your margin) without touching CAC. Bundles, upsells, and minimums all help.
Because LTV is on profit, a few points of margin move the ratio more than most acquisition tactics. Watch discounting and fees.
Shorter payback frees cash to reinvest sooner. Faster-paying channels can fund faster growth even at a lower ratio.
If max-affordable-CAC sits well above your current CAC, you have room to bid up and acquire faster while staying healthy.
New product mix, a price change, or a fee increase all move margin and LTV. Re-run the numbers before scaling spend.
The LTV CAC Calculator works across every stage of the workflow.
Find the max CAC you can afford at a 3:1 target, then set channel bids and budgets against that ceiling.
Show a defensible, gross-profit LTV:CAC ratio and payback — the unit economics every investor asks for.
A ratio below 3:1 says fix retention/margin first; well above 3:1 with fast payback says scale acquisition.
Run paid CAC per channel against the same LTV to see which acquisition channels actually pay back.
Use churn-based LTV for a subscription line and Simple for a one-time product, in the same tool.
See how a loyalty program that lifts repeat rate changes LTV and the ratio before you build it.
Every important term you'll encounter in this calculator and the broader topic.
Everything you need to know about how the LTV CAC Calculator works.
The classic benchmark is 3:1 — a customer is worth about three times what you paid to acquire them. Below 1:1 you lose money on every customer (unsustainable); 1–3:1 is thin and leaves little room for error; 3–5:1 is healthy; above 5:1 is strong but often means you're under-investing in growth and could profitably acquire faster. Ecommerce ratios tend to run lower than SaaS because gross margins are lower (40–60% vs 70–85%).
Gross profit — always, when comparing to CAC. This is the single most common unit-economics mistake. A customer who spends $200 over their lifetime at a 45% margin generates only $90 in gross profit. Using the $200 revenue figure makes a real 3:1 ratio look like a flattering 6.7:1, which leads brands to overspend on acquisition and run out of cash. This calculator uses gross-profit LTV by default and shows the revenue figure only as a contrast, with a warning.
CAC payback is the number of months it takes to earn back the cost of acquiring a customer, from their monthly gross profit: CAC ÷ monthly contribution margin. Under 6 months is ideal, 6–12 months is acceptable, and over 12 months is risky for ecommerce because you fund acquisition and inventory out of pocket until the customer turns profitable. A 2:1 ratio with a 6-month payback can be healthier for cash flow than a 5:1 ratio that takes two years.
CAC = total sales & marketing spend ÷ the number of new customers acquired in the same period. Include ad spend, agency fees, promotions, and acquisition-related salaries; exclude retention and loyalty spend. "Blended" CAC divides all spend by all new customers (including organic) and gives a whole-business view; "paid" CAC counts only paid channels and is the honest number for judging paid acquisition. This calculator computes CAC for you, or lets you enter one you already track.
Simple LTV = AOV × purchases per year × gross margin × customer lifespan (in years) — best for repeat-purchase ecommerce when you know roughly how long customers stay. Churn-based LTV = (AOV × purchases per year × gross margin) ÷ annual churn rate — best for subscriptions or when you track churn. They reconcile exactly: lifespan = 1 ÷ churn, so a 50% annual churn equals a 2-year lifespan. This tool offers both in one interface so you can use whichever data you have.
Your max affordable CAC = LTV ÷ your target ratio. At a $90 gross-profit LTV and a 3:1 target, you can spend up to $30 per customer. The calculator shows this ceiling plus the "headroom" versus your current CAC: positive headroom means you have unused acquisition budget and could bid higher to grow faster; negative headroom means you're overspending and will fall short of your target. This reverse calculation is the number founders actually need for budgeting.
Mostly gross margin. SaaS businesses run 70–85% gross margins, so most of each dollar of revenue becomes lifetime profit. Ecommerce runs 40–60% margins because of product cost, shipping, and fulfilment, which compresses the profit LTV for the same revenue. That's also why a "good" ecommerce ratio (often 2.5–3:1) looks lower than a "good" SaaS ratio (3–4:1+) — and why computing LTV on profit, not revenue, matters even more in ecommerce.
Because of cash velocity. The LTV:CAC ratio tells you whether a customer is profitable eventually; payback tells you how fast. A brand with a 2:1 ratio and a 6-month payback recovers its spend quickly and can reinvest, while a 5:1 ratio with a 24-month payback ties up cash in acquisition and inventory for two years — a common way for "profitable on paper" ecommerce brands to run out of money. Read both together.
Blended CAC divides ALL acquisition spend by ALL new customers, including those who came organically (SEO, referrals, word of mouth). It flatters your number because free customers cost nothing. Paid CAC counts only customers from paid channels against paid spend, giving the true cost of buying growth. Use blended for a whole-business health check, but use paid CAC — compared to the same LTV — when deciding whether a paid channel is worth scaling.
Yes. It is fully global and currency-agnostic: you enter every monetary value (spend, AOV, CAC) in your own currency and all results are shown in that currency. There are no exchange rates or conversions because the math is universal — ratios, months, and percentages mean the same thing everywhere. The benchmarks (3:1 ratio, sub-12-month payback) are international standards.
Four levers: raise retention/repeat-purchase rate (usually the cheapest — it lifts LTV across every customer you've ever acquired), increase AOV through bundling and upsells, protect gross margin (because LTV is on profit, a few margin points move the ratio a lot), or reduce CAC by improving targeting and conversion. The calculator's retention sensitivity readout shows how much just a half-purchase more per year would raise your ratio — often more than any acquisition tactic.
No — version 1 uses nominal LTV (no discounting for the time value of money). For most ecommerce models with customer lifespans of 1–3 years, the difference is small and nominal LTV is the standard, easy-to-reason-about figure. If you model very long lifespans (5+ years) or run formal DCF-based valuations, treat the LTV here as a slight overstatement and apply your own discount rate to the later years.
Keep exploring
Find your true ad ROAS, ACoS, break-even point, and the max CPC you can profitably bid.
See your real Shopify profit per order and per month — plan fee, payment processing, COGS, ads, and the exact revenue where upgrading your plan pays off.
Find the exact price to charge to hit your target margin after marketplace and payment fees — the pricing tool that grosses up for fees so you never underprice.
Turn your cart abandonment rate into a recovery plan: see lost revenue this period, the share you can win back at your recovery rate, and the annual total.
Category
Ecommerce Seller Operations
Subcategory
financial profitability
Availability
Global · 9 markets
Price
Free forever
Topics
Calculators, simulators, and decision tools for every stage of business operations.
Your honest feedback shapes what we build next. Takes 30 seconds, fully anonymous — we don't ask for your name or email.